« March 2012 | Main | May 2012 »

2 posts from April 2012

04/30/2012

Tweets, Blogs, Journalism, Scientific Journals, and Press Releases

This afternoon I stopped by the Departmental office to check my mailbox and print a few things on the photocopier. While in the office I overheard a conversation about what should go in a tweet. I do not know the context of the discussion but I was reminded that different modes of communication have different functions.

At home this evening I read the Planet of the Apes blog. There was a post on communication by the press. Discussed was a paper in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/evolution/Space-Dinosaurs-and-How-Not-To-Criticize-the-Press-.html

A superfluous and unsubstantiated point in the paper became a news item. The journalist points out problems in the review process for the scientific journal and problems with how the information was presented to the general public.

Scientists focus on producing new knowledge. Disseminating that knowledge is important and accurate communication is crucial to progress in science. The more ways we have to communicate the more careful we need to be about which one we choose.

An NPR News piece from last week looks at some of the problem these choices can cause in personal communication.

http://www.npr.org/2012/04/26/151351550/what-we-have-here-a-failure-to-communicate?sc=17&f=1019

04/17/2012

Many Prescription Medications Should be Available Without a Prescription from a Pharmacist

By Dr. Daniel A. Hussar is the Remington Professor of Pharmacy at University of the Sciences' Philadelphia College of Pharmacy. He serves as the author and editor of The Pharmacist Activist newsletter (http://www.pharmacistactivist.com) from which this editorial was taken.

The Federal Register of Tuesday, February 28 (pages 12059 - 12062) included a notice from the Food and Drug Administration that it would hold a public hearing on March 22 and 23 to receive comments on the subject, "Using Innovative Technologies and Other Conditions of Safe Use To Expand Which Drug Products Can Be Considered Nonprescription." I was one of the participants in the hearing and presented the testimony provided below:

Food and Drug Administration Public Hearing

March 22, 2012

Comments provided by Daniel A. Hussar, B.S. (Pharmacy), Ph.D.
Remington Professor of Pharmacy,
Philadelphia College of Pharmacy
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

I commend the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for convening this hearing to receive comments and opinions on a topic that I believe represents a very important opportunity to improve health care for millions of individuals. The perspectives and recommendations I am providing are based on my responsibilities as a pharmacist and faculty member at the Philadelphia College of Pharmacy that include teaching our required Nonprescription Therapeutics course, having taught every area of drug therapy, and having written and spoken about every new drug marketed in the United States in the last 40 years.

As stated in the Federal Register announcement of this public hearing, "Undertreatment of many common diseases or conditions in the United States is a well recognized public health problem." Millions of Americans do not see a physician or other prescriber unless they are experiencing symptoms they can no longer tolerate. Millions of Americans use unregulated herbal and other natural products, as well as dietary supplements, for which there is no evidence of effectiveness and safety. It is my strong conviction that there are actions that can be taken that will greatly increase access to, effectiveness, and safety of a significantly larger number of medications. These actions will result in better health care that is provided in an efficient manner, and will also reduce the burden on emergency rooms and many physician providers.

The responsibilities of pharmacists currently include the assessment of the type and severity of symptoms described by patients, decisions whether to refer a patient to a physician/emergency department or to recommend the use of nonprescription medications, and, in the latter situation, to provide the counseling and monitoring needed to assure the appropriate management of the
condition. Pharmacists have the knowledge and accessibility to assume a greatly expanded role in the appropriate use of medications. The topics being addressed at this hearing are particularly important and timely with respect to their relationship to the recent Report to the Surgeon General, Improving Patient and Health System Outcomes through Advanced Pharmacy Practice.

My comments will primarily focus on the identification of medications that currently require a prescription, but which I would recommend for availability without a prescription in a pharmacy with the consultation of a pharmacist. The following medications are examples of those that I recommend for nonprescription availability from a pharmacist.

1. Epinephrine auto-injector for severe allergic reactions.
2. Albuterol for oral inhalation for acute asthma attacks.
3. Naloxone for narcotic overdosage.

Epinephrine, albuterol, and naloxone are used for the treatment of very serious and even life-threatening experiences. These events require emergency treatment and often occur in an area and/or at a time in which the local pharmacy is more accessible than a physician or a hospital.

4. Triptans (e.g., sumatriptan) for migraine headache.

Migraine attacks can be severe and disabling for some patients. The sooner the use of effective treatment can be initiated, the greater the likelihood of relieving symptoms on a timely basis and preventing worsening of the migraine attack.

5. Oseltamivir for influenza.

Oseltamivir is one of a very small number of medications that is effective for the treatment of influenza. However, for this drug to be optimally effective, it is very important that treatment be initiated as soon as possible following the onset of symptoms (within two days). Patients who experience influenza symptoms should be provided the fastest access possible to medication that might be of significant benefit.

6. Statins (e.g., atorvastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin) for hyperlipidemia.

Many individuals, rather than seeing a physician and receiving prescribed medications for high cholesterol concentrations, are purchasing dietary/nutritional supplements such as red yeast rice in which a statin is the primary active ingredient. These products have not been evaluated in clinical studies, there are little or no safety data, and there is often no assurance of standardization of active ingredients. In these situations, it is highly preferable to have nonprescription pharmacy availability of statins that have been extensively studied, have a known safety profile, and will be monitored by a pharmacist.

7. Diuretics (e.g., hydrochlorothiazide) for edema and high blood pressure.
8. Tamsulosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
9. Agents for overactive bladder (e.g., tolterodine).
10. Celecoxib for pain and inflammation.
11. Cyclobenzaprine for musculoskeletal symptoms.
12. Ramelteon for insomnia characterized by difficulty in falling asleep.
13. Corticosteroids (e.g., fluticasone propionate) for intranasal administration for allergic rhinitis.
14. Montelukast for allergic rhinitis.
15. Agents for smoking cessation (nicotine nasal spray, nicotine inhalation system, varenicline).

More than 440,000 Americans die each year as a result of smoking-related illnesses. Although some smokers have been successful in quitting with the use of nonprescription nicotine replacement therapy (gum, lozenge, patch) or other strategies, others have not had a successful experience with these products.


There are many smokers who want to quit but who will not set up an appointment with a physician to discuss other options. For these individuals, the nonprescription availability from a pharmacist of nicotine nasal spray, nicotine inhalation system, and varenicline will provide a pharmacist-monitored opportunity for a successful effort to stop smoking. It is an unacceptable irony that only proof of age is required to purchase a dangerous product like cigarettes whereas a prescription is required to obtain certain of the products that will help individuals stop smoking.

Attention should also be given to revision of the labeling of the nicotine replacement therapy formulations that are currently available without a prescription. For example, the labeling for these products contains the statement, "Do not use if you continue to smoke..." Although the goal is for the individual to not smoke at all, some are not able to resist the craving to smoke but do so on a less frequent basis. Because they have not followed the specific instructions, they may conclude that the treatment has not been successful and discontinue it. However, a substantial reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked should also be considered a positive result and a source of encouragement to stop smoking completely. The labeling for the nonprescription nicotine replacement therapies also includes a statement that individuals should not use a second nicotine-containing product concurrently. However, this statement may actually preclude the use of what, for some individuals, may actually be the best strategy to stop smoking, that is to use the patch to provide a sustained low concentration of nicotine and the lozenge or gum to provide a prompt, but brief, action when cravings to smoke are experienced.

In addition to these examples, there are also other prescription medications that can be considered for nonprescription availability from a pharmacist. With certain of the agents identified, there will be a need for specific parameters and guidelines to assure appropriate use and these will vary depending on the medication. However, this should not be reason to delay consideration of medicationsfor which a change in status can be made quickly.

The increase in the number of nonprescription medications that are available from a pharmacist will not only result in increased patient access to helpful medications, but will also make them available on a more cost-effective basis.

I also anticipate that there will be increased communication, collaboration, and referrals between pharmacists and prescribers as they fulfill their individual responsibilities for the patients being served. Neither the FDA nor the public should tolerate "turf battles" among the health professions as these issues are addressed. There is much more to be done in improving the scope and quality of health care and preventing drug-related problems than all of the health professions are doing now.

We can and must do much better. The opportunities that the FDA is considering are ones in which all participants can "win," and I urge your bold and prompt action.

© 2011 University of the Sciences in Philadelphia • 600 South 43rd Street • Philadelphia, PA 19104 • 215.596.8800